Posts Tagged ‘Republican Party’

Who is Michael Steele?

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

Yesterday the RNC chose a new chairman to lead the Republican Party. Being head of a political party is not something that I could ever see myself doing as I like to be an independent minded critic that points out the negatives of all candidates. Blame it on my cynicism, but being a cheerleader for a bunch of politicians is not a job that I could respect myself in. If I ever rose to any level within a political party, I would still remain a vocal critic even of those in my party.

Michael Steele was one of five seeking the head of the RNC. He won on the sixth ballot. I watched most of the action as it happened on CSPAN. I must say that this is really the first time I have watched such an election. I actually have found this to be a superior form of electing a leader as you cannot have several good candidates with split support and a terrible candidate with solid support. If you had 5 good candidates each pulling in 15% each, but the 6th candidate may be a horrible choice but he may have 25%. It kind of makes me think of the Corker, Bryant, Van Hilleary Senate race from a few years back. You had Bryant and Van Hilleary running as conservatives and Corker as a moderate. Had Van Hilleary or Bryant dropped out, I am sure the other would have won. Instead, we got stuck with the moderate.

Steele, himself, is somewhat of a moderate on issues. He is pro-life but believes that Roe v. Wade is settled law that should remain. With civil rights type issues, he is pro-traditional marriage, but he is also pro-affirmitive action. He is also against the death penalty. He is conservative on a host of other issues, however. He is against No Child Left Behind (believe it or not, this is actually a conservative ideal), for guns, against socialized medicine, and against illegal immigration.

Steele also received the endorsement of Newt Gingrich and he led GOPAC, a political action committee that develops candidates for state and local offices.

Steele has some minority appeal as an African-American, but his leadership with GOPAC makes him a prime candidate to lead Republicanism back into the mainstream on a grassroots level. While I would like Steele to be a stronger conservative on some issues, he may have been the best candidate to bring the Republican Party back from the ashes.

Speaker Pro-Tempore Causes Worry

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

For the past several years, the GOP has show us how not to lead.  As a Republican, I feel that it is my duty to speak out when I see things that potentially damage our party.  I take it upon myself from time to time to aggressively pursue (attack ?) those responsible as I did with Carter County State Representative, Kent Williams.  As you may remember, Williams was one of the Naifeh Republicans (a Republican turncoat whom voted for the worst of the worst, Jimmy Naifeh, as the Speaker of the House.  Don’t give me all that David Davis voted for Naifeh drivel.  When there is an Iraqi or Iranian type election where you vote for the only candidate available, you really don’t have much of a choice do you?) that faced scrutiny in the Republican Caucus.  I took him to task for that.  Then, there was a certain rumor concerning Williams that I called him out on through e-mail.  No, that e-mail is no longer posted on my website since the Great Website Deletion of only a short time ago.  Yes, I do still have that e-mail. 

These examples show that I am willing (and sometimes maybe more than willing) to take my own party to task.  (FYI, I am always more than happy to take the Democrats to task.)  This is now another time that I am going to take my party to task.  This one, I thought long and hard about. 

The Republican Party took everyone by surprise by going against the stream in electing a majority to the State House this November.  Democrats were making big gains just about everywhere else, but our Republican Party took forward a conservative message that resonated with the citizens (except for the dead voters in Memphis) of Tennessee.  Now, it seems that the Republican Party is already losing its way. 

(Future Speaker of the House?) Jason Mumpower saw a chance at controlling the Tennessee House of Representatives.  He needed to make sure that the Republicans stuck together to give him (or another Republican) the 50 votes to remove the tyrannical Jimmy Naifeh from the House’s top spot.  I have no problem there when you have most of the self-serving “Naifeh Republicans” still hanging around.  Mumpower brought the Republican Caucus to Nashville where each and every Republican signed a statement saying they would vote for a Republican Speaker of the House.  Robin Smith, Tennessee Republican Party Chairman, has stated that the members of the Republican Caucus could face political excommunication from the Republican Party if they do not vote with the party on certain votes. 

Fast forward to earlier this week…  The Republican Caucus got together to choose the high ranking, though mostly ceremonial position of Speaker Pro-Tempore.  Two candidates went head to head.  On the one hand, you had former Sundquist crony, pro-income tax, “Naifeh Republican,” Steve McDaniel.  On the other hand, the party had a choice of the conservative Frank Nicely.  Sadly, at least half of the “Republicans” voted for McDaniel as he won the Speaker Pro-Tempore spot.

This choice leaves the Republican Party with a pro-tax, self-serving, “Republican” in a leadership position.  I hope this is the worst mistake that the party makes in the majority stage, but I hope that this is not enough to sink this ship from sailing into the Speaker’s Chair. 

I will be a little presumptive as I say this, but I will do it anyway.  Speaker Mumpower (hopefully I won’t have to edit and strike this through come January), we are looking for conservative leadership.  The state is looking for Republicans to lead.  We are sick of what Naifeh has tried to pass as leadership.  We know YOU can do better than what we have seen for years.  However, we conservatives are not finding solace in your first attempt of leadership in the majority.  We expect and know we can do great things if leadership leads.  As Rep. Campfield has said many times, “It matters who leads.”  Lead with honor.  Lead conservatively.

- Josh

Read Terry Frank and David Oatney (even if he is just giving ACK fodder, and I do say that in jest, which is not a reference to any e-mails that I received nearly two years ago)

Jorge W. Bush Es Un Idiota

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

El Presidente Jorge W. Bush is a reason why the American public is turning against the Republican Party.  As a Republican and conservative (first and foremost a conservative) I am going to firmly disagree with his decision to not release Compean and Ramos (the border agents that fired on a Mexican drug dealer). 

I have never been one that says that people who speak out against elected officials are anti-American.  I have not had to speak badly of my Congressman (David Davis) on any issue.  He has served my ideas fairly well.  I have had major disagreements with my US Senators (Alexander and Corker).  I do find myself speaking out against things that President Bush does quite often.  I firmly believe that I will be speaking out against the future ex-President Obama and yes, possibly even calling him names, more often than I have had to do with President Bush (Only 1507 days to Inauguration Day 2012). 

In this case, President Bush should pardon the two border guards immediately.  If he does not do so before leaving office, I hope history will judge him harshly. 

We need true conservatives carrying the conservative banner. 

Who did President Bush pardon?  He pardoned a rapper, John Forte, who was convicted of smuggling cocaine into the United States. 

This whole scenario is quite ironic.  President Bush pardons a drug smuggler, but President Bush will not pardon two border agents that attempted to stop someone from smuggling drugs into the Unites States.  This reasoning says that President Bush has absolutely no problem with hard drugs.

Ballot Challenges in Minnesota

Thursday, November 20th, 2008

I thought the Left always wanted EVERY vote accepted.

A ballot questioned by the Franken team can be seen here.

I guess it is only ones that may be marked for the Democrat.

For the story, click here.

How Obama Won In a Right of Center Nation

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008

In a previous blog post, I discussed some ways that the GOP needs to evaluate itself.  Truth is, Obama won by a fairly large margin.  There are several ways that he did so.

The first reason, in my opinion, is that voters were tired of Republican rule.  I am a Republican.  I could never vote for a Democrat in a state or national election.  I may be narrow-minded for making such a statement, but a vote for a Democrat in any state or national election is more than a vote just for that candidate.  This will put forth an agenda that I, as a Conservative, could not endorse.  Those who voted for any of the “Naifeh Republicans” (if you are from outside Tennessee you may not understand unless you investigate) indirectly helped advance the liberal agenda.  However, many Americans, including me, were tired of what was passing as Conservatism.  The Republican rule has been far from Conservative both socially and fiscally.  Others had their own pet peeves about what has come from Republican rule.

The second reason is that Republicans have been acting more like Democrats.  The Republican Party used to be the party of small government.  One would be hard pressed to argue that the Bush White House was for smaller government.  The one smaller government idea that I can point to is lower taxes.  There were very little other gains.  I want to clarify that Republicans and Democrats are really not all that close in philosophy, but I do want to point out that the Republicans gained near absolute power in the only way you can in a republic.  That near absolute power corrupted nearly absolutely.  We were acting like those same corrupt Democrats that we despise.

The third reason is that Obama capitalized on a two-fold message.  HOPE and CHANGE.  Americans felt that things were getting bad because of debt and economic problems of our country.  They were right.  Americans felt that Republicans (especially President Bush) were to blame.  They were only partially right.  It was a bad time to be an incumbent or a Republican.  It was a doubly bad time to be both a Republican and an incumbent.  That message of HOPE and CHANGE was something that citizens (Conservative, Liberal, and Moderate) were willing to choose.

The fourth reason is that the mainstream media had a love affair with Obama.  The media loves someone who can talk a good game.  The media equally loves someone who is a Liberal.  Obama met both qualifications.  Even parody shows failed to go after Obama.  Was it that these people were scared of being called a racist or just in love with Obama?  I believe that it was more love, but nonetheless, a fear of being marked as racist had to be in their minds.

The fifth reason, the biggest reason, is that the American public does not have a clue what is going on.  A Zogby poll of Obama supporters showed that Obama supporters are… shall we say… lacking in “intellectual fortitude.”  Did I just call Obama supporters stupid?  I will say that Obama supporters either have a screwed up ideology that does not jive with what it means to live in a republic or to be American, or they ARE stupid lacking in “intellectual fortitude.” 

The results of the Zogby poll were startling.  I teach a computer class.  My students have tests that they take.  Some of them refuse to take the tests seriously and they take a 100 question multiple choice test with four possible answers, and they make a 25 on average.  If they make a 30, I know that they probably guessed on most, but they knew an answer or two.  If they make below a 20, it almost seems as if they sabotaged their answers.  In this Zogby poll, Obama fans showed they had no clue what was going on.  With a 50-50 shot, more than 57 percent did not know that the Democrats control Congress.  That question must have been below their pay-grade.  When asked about which of the four Presidential or Vice-Presidential candidates quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (that is a 25 percent chance for all of you Obama supporters), over 80 percent missed the question.  Furthermore, when asked which of the four candidates said he or she would bankrupt the coal industry and cause prices to skyrocket  (still a 25 percent chance for you Obama supporters… ahh heck with it, can they even read this?), more than 88 percent did not know that this was Obama.

But by golly (re-read that in a Palinesque accent), they knew all of the dirt on the Republicans.  More than 86 percent knew that Palin was the one that had $150,000 spent on her wardrobe by the GOP.  Nearly 94 percent knew that Palin had a pregnant teenage daughter.  Oh, and 87 percent “knew” that Palin stated that she could see Russia from her house (which by the way was not Palin, but Tina Fey). 

Sadly, McCain was chosen by Republicans that had about the same amount of “intellectual fortitude.”  Well, maybe not quite that bad, but there were definitely better choices. 

*** The above is simply a piece saying that Obama supporters and even those who chose McCain as the Republican nominee as a whole did not have a grasp on issues.  Obama supporters simply wanted “change” whatever that means (and which we may soon find out).  McCain supporters simply wanted someone enough like the Democrats that he could win.  I guess that backfired didn’t it? ***

Here are some other reads on the subject and the fallout:

http://www.howobamagotelected.com/

http://libertarianrepublican.blogspot.com/2008/11/some-conservatives-actually-helped-to.html

http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/2008/11/republican-party-or-donner-party.html

Red Hat Rob’s “Reapportionment & Redistricting 101”

Friday, November 14th, 2008

Red Hat Rob has a blog entry explaining the reapportionment of congressional seats following the census and the redistricting that can and will take place following the census.  Gerrymandering will more than likely take the Tennessee delegation from being in the Republican minority in the US House to a majority. 

He also explains why Tennessee, a red state, has a Democratic majority.  Read more here.

Newt Now Backing Steele

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

Word on the blogs is that Newt Gingrich is now backing Steele for the RNC post.  Fred Thompson has also been mentioned, but he is not the one to lead the Republican Party back.  I like Fred.  I even considered voting for him in the Republican Primary, but he does not have any charisma to lead the RNC.  We should probably now look toward Steele.

Newt Ready, Willing, and Able

Monday, November 10th, 2008

Newt Gingrich has stated that he is ready, willing, and able to take over as RNC Chairman.  Hopefully the RNC will look to him to try to make the gains he helped gain in 1994.  He also wants to move (gasp)… the party back to the right. 

I urge everyone to contact the RNC and urge them to look to Newt to take back the soul of the Republican Party.

Mailing Address:
Republican National Committee
310 First Street, SE
Washington, DC 20003

Phone Numbers:
Comment Line & General Information: 202.863.8790
Phone: 202.863.8500
Fax: 202.863.8820

Email Addresses:
General Information: info@gop.com Technical Contact: ecampaign@gop.com

Rep. Kent Williams to Vote for Mumpower for Speaker

Monday, November 10th, 2008

The Carter County State Representative and frequent (former?) target of The Arrowood Dispatch has stated that he will vote for Jason Mumpower as Speaker of the House.  I want to congratulate Rep. Williams on this move though I wonder why he has had the change of heart from two years ago.

The Chattanoogan has the story.

GOP Self Exam

Sunday, November 9th, 2008

Now that the election is over, it is time for the GOP to examine itself.  The GOP needs to evaluate what has gone wrong the last 8 years, and then we need to create a plan of where we will go from here.  I have some pointers on what the GOP can do nationally and at the state level. 

 

First, let’s examine the McCain loss.  They say hindsight is 20/20, but many Conservatives saw this coming.  Many of us simply hoped that if McCain were to win, he would continue to pretend to be a Conservative.  The Palin pick energized the base, but that seemed to be just a ploy to make Conservatives believe that McCain was one of us. 

 

McCain says that he puts country first.  He did put country first as he fought valiantly for our country, but Obama-mania literally scared many Republicans into thinking that this has been more than a catchphrase since he has been in the Senate.  If McCain had a ‘D’ next to his name, I dare say that most Conservatives and/or Republicans would have a far different take and spin on his “country first” slogan.

 

He has been a champion of some of the most detrimental legislation and confirmation votes that we have ever seen.  These votes certainly did not put country first.  These votes gave liberty a backseat.  If we were to look at the courts, we can see two judges that should never be in a courtroom except as defendants in Breyer and Ginsburg.  Both of these justices were confirmed by John McCain.  Neither of the justices put country first as evidenced in their usage of international law in deciding “constitutional law.”

 

Another anti-liberty measure that McCain not only supported, but that McCain also developed is the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2000.  Most of us know it as McCain-Feingold.  If you are not sure what it is, basically it is legislation that attempts to limit freedom of speech by limiting what type of ads can be run within a certain timeframe of an election.  It also limits ones ability to donate money to political causes.

 

McCain has several other positions that show that he is not one to be trusted with our rights and liberty.  McCain was self-serving as he considered changing parties and even considered (and possibly even lobbied for) the Democratic nomination as VP for John Kerry.  McCain also flip-flopped on tax cuts when it became politically suicidal for him to be against the “Bush tax cuts.”  McCain has also not been a friend to gun owners.  (Note: McCain did get the NRA endorsement, but it was more of an anti-Obama endorsement.)  Let’s also not forget that McCain pushed hard for perhaps the most anti-American legislation that we have seen in the last decade.  In a time when America has been under attack, McCain fought hard to allow the US to be vulnerable to future attacks when he pushed for McCain-Kennedy which would have given amnesty and citizenship to illegal immigrants.

 

I would argue that McCain has caused severe harm to our liberties as Americans, and I would argue that McCain has caused great harm to the Republican name.

 

Next, I would like to focus on the sitting President.  I want to say that I think President Bush is a good man.  I also feel that history will be better to him than we see now.  However, we see that President Bush is not the Conservative that he tried to portray himself as in 2000.  A few of the instances are the immigration fiasco, out of control spending, the bailout plan, and his nomination of Harriet Miers as a Supreme Court Justice.  All of this bumbling, combined with the division that the Iraq War created hurt the Republican brand.

 

The third, and perhaps the one with the most blame, is the Republican controlled chambers of the Bush presidency.  Republicans in the House and Senate had trouble telling President Bush, “NO!”  Divided government is good when there is a lack of principle.  The Democratic Party has been the one with a lack of principle.  They have stood for bigger government.  The Republican Party has been the party of principle with an ideology for smaller government.  We Conservatives learned that this principle was skin deep as the Republicans expanded government at a very alarming pace. 

 

Conservatism was not rejected on Tuesday.  The moderation and liberalism of the Republican Party was what was rejected.  I will go on record as saying that the American people were either blinded by Obama’s message of “Change,” or the American people were duped.  I won’t blatantly say that Americans were stupid for electing Obama.  I won’t blatantly say that Republicans were stupid for choosing McCain.  This election was not just about the lesser of two evils.  Obama is extremely anti-American.  I won’t say that he hates America as it is, but there is no doubt that he despises what the Founders created.  Look at his quotes on the Constitution and the Founders.  It seems that he believes that the Founders made a mistake in their ideas.  However, McCain was a far greater evil than most Republicans were willing to recognize.  McCain should have never even come close to the Presidency.  While McCain was the lesser of two evils, he nevertheless was too much of an evil to have in the Oval Office.  America would have been worse than it is today as a result of a McCain presidency.  Sadly, the United States is much worse off with an Obama presidency.  The GOP needs to focus on republicanism and small government.  The GOP needs to get serious about its Conservatism.  The Tennessee GOP has done this fairly well.  The National GOP needs to take notice and return to its Conservative roots.

Tennessee GOP House Party

Thursday, November 6th, 2008

The Tennessee Republican Party was a big winner on Tuesday even as the Democrats won throughout most of the rest of the nation.  The Tennessee State Senate should remain under the leadership of Lt. Gov. Ramsey.  The Tennessee Senate had been 16-16-1, but the GOP picked up 3 seats.

 

The Tennessee House also tipped to the direction of the GOP.  Jason Mumpower is set to take over the Speaker’s chair if he can keep the GOP delegation in line.  There had been talks about Rep. Odom attempting a coup, which could make things interesting anyways.  Let’s just hope that the Naifeh Republicans do the right thing and get rid of the bum. 

 

Those that voted for Jimmy Naifeh in 2007 were Mike Harrison (District 9), Joe McCord (District 8), Steve McDaniel (District 72), Richard Montgomery (District 12), Dennis Roach (District 35), and Kent Williams (District 4).  Hopefully none of these will do the same.

 

*** David Oatney is reporting that a source has given him information that a deal has been reached between Mumpower and the “Naifeh Republicans.” ***