And I Thought Henry VIII was Crazy

Apparently, talking to plants is normal to Prince Charles.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/prince-charles-eavesdrops-tourists-speaks-plants/story?id=11679656

Posted in International News, International Politics, News, Politics | Leave a comment

The Story of Gideon

I know I don’t talk about religion much on here. Sometimes, however, my posts do have a religious slant. I tend to keep my religious beliefs very private, and I don’t like to air my dirty laundry or any religious group’s dirty laundry in public. It seems that tends to be what most people do when they want to discuss religion. I don’t enjoy doing that. I do enjoy debating and discussing religion with friends or brothers, but I keep many of my beliefs personal because stating them would do nothing. I also know that I have many faults, and I know that I fail God miserably. The Bible says that we should not judge others lest we be judged. This is talking about the fact that if we judge others, we are setting ourselves up to be judged by God. I don’t live up to God’s standard. I wish that I did, but it is impossible. That is why we must depend on his grace. The Bible does say that we must judge a tree by its fruit.

I have weighed in on the burning of the Quran in Florida.  I still think it was a stupid idea as it does not help further Christ’s kingdom.  It is meaningless and would only stir up anger.  I do, however, support their right to do this if they so choose.  I support the 1st Amendment wholeheartedly.  I do not support ignorance, but I support their right to do this.  The freedom of association allows me to associate or not associate with those types of people.  I, apparently, do not subscribe to their version of Christianity.  If Christians come into contact with religious books that go against Christianity, Christians should try and make sure that those things do not find their way to others as a way to keep others from falling into error.

I also weighed in on the building of the mosque.  I do not like the idea of the building of the mosque near Ground Zero.  I do not like the idea of a mosque being built anywhere.  As a Christian, I believe that Christ is the ONLY way to heaven.  I do not believe anyone gets to heaven through Islam or any other religion.  I do support the freedom of religion and the right to property.  This means I must accept the right for a mosque to be built there or anywhere else. 

That is my religious stance as I attempt to relate it to my beliefs on rights and liberties, but it is not the reason for my post.

I have had an issue that I have been praying about for years.  I have prayed for guidance and even signs on what to do.  God is not slow to answer.  We have to be open to what He is saying.  I don’t think I have been.  When we do not listen to what He says, it is sin.  It can lead us to greater sin if we are not careful.  When you run from what God says, it compounds problems.  I have been uncomfortable with decisions I have made.  I know what is right and what is wrong.  I have not gone where God has led.

The story of Gideon is found in the Bible in Judges.  It is an amazing story of how God told a man to do something.  The man did not make many excuses as did Moses in questioning the power of God, but He questioned whether God was really calling him to do something.  He asked for a sign.  He laid out a fleece and asked God to make the fleece wet, but leave the ground dry.  The next morning, Gideon went out and the fleece was wet, but the ground was indeed dry.  That wasn’t good enough for Gideon.  He asked God to forgive him for asking again, but he asked God to make the opposite happen.  He asked that God would keep the fleece dry but the ground wet.  The next morning he found the the fleece totally dry but the ground soaked.

I am not suggesting that God will always give signs.  He expects us to listen to Him when He speaks.  When we don’t, He sometimes gives us signs.  We just have to keep our eyes open.  Sometimes God speaks through a fire as He did with Moses.  Sometimes God speaks to us as he tears down as He showed Israel through the prophets.  I believe God tried to speak to me these ways, but I did not listen. 

This burden has hindered me from growing in Christ.  I have wanted to fix it for a long time, but it recently got unbearable.  I was sitting in a church service the other night.  I was scanning the song book and laughed to myself as I thought about my burden.  Silently I prayed that God would again show me a sign.  I picked three songs out of the song book.  The first two songs were songs that were sung quite often when we use that particular song book.  I asked that God have the song leader choose just one of those songs if His will was that I go the direction I felt was opposite of what He had been showing me.  The third song is my favorite hymn.  It is a song that I have only heard a total of three times maybe since I had been going to church there.  I felt pretty safe in using that as the song that God would have sung if I were to follow what I felt He was telling me.  I had not even finished praying when the song leader announced the next song would be “Give Me Lord a Double Portion,” which is my favorite hymn.  I was amazed, but I did not fully accept it as God speaking. 

Last Sunday night we were again sitting in church.  Again that burden was weighing on me.  I prayed for another sign.  I prayed that the next time I was at church that a certain guest preacher would preach.  It is never announced that the pastor will not be there for a service.  We just find out when the guest preacher gets up to preach.  Low and behold, the very next service, that guest preacher got up and preached.  Now, at this point, I have been spoken to through a fire.  I have seen God tear down.  I have been given the sign of a wet fleece and dry ground, and I have been given the sign of a dry fleece and wet ground.  It was certainly weighing on my mind, but I still did not listen.  I told my wife of my decision, but in my own mind I was still wavering. 

I guess biblically it is unprecedented, but I asked for one more sign.  I asked that God have a specific idea preached that I disagree with.  I also asked God to show me a general acceptance for the idea from others around me and that I must do what He told me.  The pastor told the congregation to turn to Hebrews 11.  I had a bit of relief as that was the faith chapter and did not concern the topic I had prayed would be preached.  I felt that I could relax that God was not telling me to do something or even give me permission to do it.  That relief began to go away as the pastor announced that he would not be preaching about what we thought.  He began preaching on the very topic that I had asked to be preached about, and it was being accepted.  I feel that God’s patience has to be stretched thin as it has taken me years to listen.  I guess the curse from Isaiah 6 that says God placed that made the eyes of the people to where they could see but not perceive and their ears hear but not understand seems to have found its way even  to me. 

My hope and prayer is that I will listen when God speaks.  I hope that I will be a useful instrument in His service.  I hope that God continues to lead and show me where He wants me.

It has been an interesting past few weeks to say the least.  I have learned a few things over the past few weeks and had some things confirmed.  I spent Labor Day weekend in Knoxville with my brother-in-law.  We went to a church that I must say I was not sure about.  It is a huge church.  I have never been one to think that all large churches are bad, but I have never been one that wanted to attend one either.  A youth pastor preached the service.  He spoke of a fictional character who lived on a deserted island.  He took his text from Romans.  He spoke of how “Dut” was without excuse for not knowing about God as he quoted a verse from Romans that confirmed this.  He also spoke of how Dut is without excuse, so even we are without excuse.  If we partake and accept what is wrong, we are just as wrong. 

Sometimes your faith is tested.  The devil opens interpretation to the point that Scripture can mean whatever you want it to mean.  This is wrong and completely of Satan.  Scripture means what is says.  God allows us to learn from examples, but those examples are true.  We cannot spiritualize things that happened and that God said was true.  When you begin to do that, you open the floodgates to allow heresy to flood in.

One heresy that has crept in is “Replacement Theology.”  Israel was not put in place just for the purpose of the coming church.  Israel is not a type of church.  The church and Israel are different and separate entities.  Israel did not forfeit any promises by not accepting Christ.  Israel’s purpose was not finished with the coming of the Messiah.  Israel still very much has a place in God’s future as He describes it in His word.  When the Bible says “Israel” you cannot insert the church and hope that it keeps its meaning.  If God can simply do away with any eternal promise, we have no hope in the eternal promise that He made to us.  A god that does this is not my God.  My God keeps all His promises.  If any of His promises have not come true, they will in His own time. 

When the Bible says “all,” it means all.  You cannot say that ”all” means “all” in some areas, but not in others.  Once again, the Bible says what it means and means what it says.  It doesn’t mean what we want it to.   

The Bible comes from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Latin.  The Bible has been translated into many languages.  Languages don’t always have words that mean exactly what a word means in another language.  For example, we have the word love.  We don’t have different words describing the type of love as the Greek does.  There are different types of love that cannot be translated appropriately to English.  Languages that do not use the Latin alphabet do not necessarily use capital letters so deciding whether something is a common noun or a proper name is not always easily able to be distinguished.  Some languages use the definite article the in front of most all nouns while some rarely use it.  When translating you cannot always tell just from looking what it means.  Going with that thought, just because the King James Version of the Bible says something or translates it a certain way does not mean that it is the best way to translate or word something.  The KJV is also 400 years old.  The English language has even changed during that time.  That does not mean that the KJV is or isn’t a good version.  I believe it is, but you have to understand the language of 400 years ago when using it.  The KJV is not the end all and be all.

I have also come to understand that God set standards for everyone.  Christians are supposed to strive to meet certain standards.  We can only do it through God’s grace.  God also sets standards for leaders.  We can try to interpret them all the ways we want, but they mean what God said they mean.  Jesus spoke on certain situations and told us the standards.  When we try to interpret how we want, we are ignoring Christ’s words.  God is so great, however, that He can and does use vessels that do not meet His standard.  That does not mean that we accept what God said is wrong. 

I have also become more aware that God told us how to deal with brothers and sisters who committ wrongs.  Matthew 18 describes that we talk with them personally, then with a few, and then openly.  We don’t call out individuals for what they have done wrong openly.  We can state that sin is sin and what is wrong is wrong, but we don’t draw attention that an individual is wrong without going through the process God has layed.  Finding another path to the goal is not an option.  When we do what is right in our own eyes and not God’s we mess things up.  Other people get hurt. 

In summary, I guess the biggest thing I have learned is that if you stick to what God has said and believe His promises, you cannot go wrong.  You just have to make sure you are listening for that small, still voice.  Don’t always depend on that loud, booming voice.

Posted in Life, Religion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

September 11, 2001 — My Story

I was at Milligan College on September 11, 2001.  I was taking a wellness class on Tuesdays.  The teacher told us that we had to spend 30 minutes working out each Tuesday and Thursday.  I usually came in after 8:45 which meant I had to stay until 9:15.  I had a humanities class at 9:30, and I did not want a big break between classes.  I remember I went in early that day because I wanted to get breakfast and study just before my test. 

After working out, I went with a few guys (I believe Joe, Tim, and maybe Aaron were their names) to the Sub to get breakfast before the test.  I got a coke and sausage biscuit and sat down to look through the art book before the test.  I remember the Today Show was on the television.  I wasn’t paying much attention to what was on, but I heard Howard Hughes mentioned.  I had recently read a book that talked about him and I remember thinking, “Oh yeah.  He was the recluse that had something to do with airplanes.”  I quickly went back to looking over the art book.  I remember Matt Lauer saying there was breaking news and thanking the guy for being on before going to break.

There were only us guys and the guy running the Sub that morning.  I believe his name was Robert.  We all kind of looked at each other wondering what was going on.  The show came back on and gave reports that a plane had hit the World Trade Center.  I remember kind of laughing thinking how in the world can someone fly into a building that big.  They said it was believed to be a small commuter plane, so there was not really a thought that someone had done it on purpose.

The show continued and they were discussing what had happened as they were speculating about what had happened.  I remember seeing a speck come out of the top right corner of the television thinking, “What is that?”  They went to another shot before the woman on the phone screamed that another plane had hit the WTC.  It was then that we knew something else was going on, or at least we thought we knew.  We then headed to take our tests.

We came out about an hour and a half later not having a clue what was going on throughout the US.  We were headed to Seeger Chapel for Convocation.  I found Candice.  She told me that a tower had collapsed, the Pentagon had been hit, and several other rumors that were going around.  She was worried because her grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins lived in the D.C. area. 

After arriving at Convocation, we were filled in on some other things that had happened.  We heard the second tower had been destroyed and that a fourth plane went down in Pennsylvania.  Lots of people were worried and angry.  I remember the chaplain talking about what was going on and reading one of his prayers. 

As soon as we were let out of the chapel, everyone went seeking a television set.  We went into the Sub.  We put in our order and sat down to watch the television.  People were standing everywhere to see what was going on.  I remember rumors being spread about what was going to happen and that more attacks were possibly taking place or soon to take place.  I remember people coming on the television pleading for anyone with information about missing loved ones to let them know.  I remember all the despair.  Word also came in that classes would continue on campus.

I went on down to my workstudy in the Admissions Office at Milligan College.  While walking downstairs, I overheard a girl worried that family or other loved ones would be called into war.  She said, “Why can’t we just kill the ones who crashed the planes into the buildings?”  I hadn’t realized until then that some people just had no clue about anything. 

I then got word that there were Palestinians dancing in the streets.  I quickly went upstairs to see the footage.  It was enough to really make someone angry.  I really try to not to lump all Muslims together, and I also try to remember that we are not at war with Islam.  For those moments, it was not possible to do.  Anger was pumped through my veins. 

I don’t remember if I had another class that afternoon.  I just remember going home, completely drained.  I was drained emotionally, mentally, and physically.  Images of the plane hitting.  Images of the people jumping.  Images of the buildings collapsing.  Images of the Palestinians dancing in the streets.  All those images were playing in my mind.  Rumors of car bombs.  Rumors of more planned attacks using planes.  Rumors of attacks on Oak Ridge.  Rumors of attacks on Eastman.  Rumors of a pipe going between Oak Ridge and Eastman that would destroy all of East Tennessee.  All of those rumors were running through my mind.  I couldn’t do anything but go straight home and go to bed.

I remember being awakened with rumors of rising gas prices and price gouging.  I had a half of tank of gas, but I knew that I needed gas at some point in time to go to school so I drove to the Road Runner near my old high school.  Lines were starting to get longer.  A tank or two was already empty.  I believe I was even one of the last ones who was able to get gas that night. 

Rumors were also going around about a probable draft.  I remember thinking that I didn’t really want to be drafted even though I had considered the military prior to going to college.  No one knew what was going on, nor did they know what would happen.  I think the scariest thing about what was going on was that no one knew anything.  I don’t enjoy being in a situation where I do not have full understanding of what was going on.  This was worse.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, International News, Life, National News, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Obama Thinks Christianity is “Un-American?”

The Obama Administration decided to weigh in on a Florida church’s plan to hold a book burning.  Now it is not just any book burning, but it is burning the Quran.  Obama felt it necessary to let it be known that he supported the building of a mosque, which in an earlier post I stated my dismay for, but support for their right to do so.  It was a bad decision on the builders’ and planners’ part, but it is their right.  Obama was right when he stated that their freedom of religion allows them to build a mosque. 

The Obama Administration will equally support the Dove World Outreach Center, right?  Apparently not.  A few administration officials have stated that it is a bad idea that may inflame hatred in the Muslim world and put our troops at danger.  I have no problem with that view.  It  is a bad idea.  It is an idea that comes from an ignorant pastor who obviously shepherds ignoramuses who will allow their pastor to do this.  It serves no purpose.  Christianity is about evangelism.  This will only cause people to be turned off.  I must, however, state that I am supportive of their right to do this.  This is a 1st Amendment issue.  They absolutely have a right to do this.  Obama, however, will not admit this.  Instead, an Obama official referred to this as “un-American.”  It is not un-American.  It is very much an American idea that you have the right to do deplorable things. 

It was to be expected.  Obama has not been friendly to Christianity (though I am slow to think that this is true Christianity).  I have never heard him speak positive of it.  He seemingly goes out of his way to speak kindly of Islam.  This, his name, and his history in Indonesia have given rise to the idea that he is a Muslim.  I don’t think that he is.  I think the reason is more so that he feels that the Muslim world is very important to placate for his presidency.  In doing so, he has basically trashed Israel to gain support from the Muslim world.  Obviously, it is only getting worse for him.

He has also been slow to stand up for the Constitution.  He described it as negative liberties, and he only quotes it or refers to it to support his policies.  The Constitution is not a governing model for him, but a tool of convenience.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, National News, National Politics, News, Politics, Religion | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Happy Birthday Candice

Wishing my wonderful wife a happy birthday even if she did sleep all afternoon and not fix me dinner.

Posted in Holiday | Tagged | 1 Comment

Costs Will Lower, Keep Your Insurance if You Want

It seems to me that two of the “false attacks” against ObamaCare were that your costs would go up and that you would not be able to keep your insurance plan.  Well, from the looks of the packet that the state just sent me, I have to change my insurance as I have to get a PPO because the POS is no longer available.  Oh, and I do believe the costs went up.  I believe I hear Joe Wilson in the background.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, National Politics, Politics, Tennessee Politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Another Obama “Mishap”

For all that Obama has done which has prolonged and worsened the financial crisis that we are in, his worst mishap may have just happened.  Obama pressured and reassured the Israelis that a nuclear Iran would not be a threat.  This may have stopped Israel from stopping Iran. 

I am not what you call an isolationist, nor am I someone who thinks we should stick our noses into another nation’s business.  A nuclear Iran, however, is a danger to world peace.  That is not to say that I think that we should have attacked Iran, but I think we are responsible for stopping Israel from attacking Iran’s capabilities before it is too late. 

At this point, Iran may only have nuclear capabilities to create nuclear energy, but it will not be long before Iran has nuclear weapons that they will undoubtedly attempt to use against Israel.  Luckily for Israel, God has a long-standing promise that He will protect them as He did protect Abraham as he traveled from Mesopotamia to where God led him; Jacob as Esau sought to kill him; Joseph and his family as they escaped drought; the Hebrews as they lived in and fled Egypt on their way to the Promised Land; from attacks by the Canaanites and Philistines; from destruction by Haman; from captivity under the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, and the Romans; from the “Christians” in the Crusades; fromt the Europeans they lived amongst peacefully until a rise of anti-Semitism; from Hitler and the rest of Europe who joined the Axis; from the Ottoman Empire; from the Arab nations in 1948, 1967, 1973, 1982, and other conflicts; and many others.

Luckily, even Obama cannot destroy the promises of God as he has our economyand healthcare.

Posted in International News, International Politics, National Politics, News, Politics, Religion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mosques and Real Meaning Behind First Amendment

Not a long post, but more of a thought.  Is building a mosque near Ground Zero a good idea?  Probably not.  I did watch Keith Olbermann the other day.  In the clip I watched online, he went on about how the place was not really a mosque and how it was not near Ground Zero.  I am not sure what the facts are, but I will continue to call it a mosque and near Ground Zero because that seems to be a general consensus.  That being said, it is not a good idea, but I do not see how government can keep someone from building a place of worship due to freedom of religion (1st Amendment), nor do I because of our right to property (Declaration of Independence).  So, it is not a good idea, but government should not have the power to stop it from being built.  It is private property, so whomever owns it should be allowed to build whatever on it.  Don’t use the zoning issue on me on this one, because I don’t really see a constitutional power that gives government the right to override property rights by allowing zoning anyway.  It is also a religious issue and as such, the government cannot make a law which would say a religious building cannot be built because that would be government making a law that would prohibit the free exercise of religion.

On the flip side of the issue, people have the right to disagree with the mosque being built.  People are given the right to protest (1st Amendment — right to assembly).  If government were to step on this right, they would be as guilty as any government official who might want to stop the building of a religious worship place.  Both are clear violations of the First Amendment, however Nancy Pelosi is just that person.  She thinks government should bully people who disagree and investigate those naysayers.  In a release, she cites the First Amendment as a reason for the right to build the mosque, but then she wants to shred the First Amendment to go after critics.  Amazing, isn’t it?

Now, onto Dr. Laura Schlessinger.  Dr. Laura is quiting her radio show later this year over a firestorm that erupted following her usage of the “N-word.”  Rightfully so, citizens called her out and called for sponsors to pull their sponsorship.  That is part of the right to assembly mentioned above.  This is not pseudo-anger as is applied in many cases by Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, but this is a problem that she created on her own.  I am not saying she is racist or anything except that she used very bad judgement.  I don’t think she should be fired, but she should have known better.  Now, she is not being fired.  The kicker is, she says she is quiting because she wants to regain her First Amendment rights.  I assume she is talking about her right to say what she wants.  She did.  The First Amendment does not guarantee that people won’t take a stance against what you said.  It simply says that government cannot make a law that takes away your right to speech.  It didn’t.  People just didn’t like what she had to say.  Seems everyone is misunderstanding what the First Amendment acutally says.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, National News, National Politics, News, Politics, Religion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Freedom of Religion or Freedom of Worship

Obama uses the term “freedom of worship,” but is this different from what the Founders and Constitution says. Read more here.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, National News, National Politics, News, Politics, Religion | Leave a comment

Poll: Who do you plan to vote for in the 2010 Republican Primary for Governor?

Just post below who you plan to vote for. You may also tell why.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bill Haslam Issues Parody

*** UPDATE ***I had to update with a new site that has the video as a few have taken the above video down due to copyright infringement. Parody is exempt from that, so it seems that Haslam is against the Constitution.

Posted in Entertainment, Politics, Tennessee Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

2010 Primary Endorsements

Early voting starts today in Tennessee. I urge you to vote for these candidates!

Tennessee Republican Nominee for Gov: Ron Ramsey.  Ron Ramsey is a solid conservative that really has no negatives.  His real positives are his gun ratings, right to life ratings, his fiscal responsibility, and his general likability.  Wamp has negatives that include voting for TARP and going back on a self-imposed term limit in Congress.  Haslam is not pro-gun.  He is pro-Haslam.  When he first announced, I listened to him get interviewed.  The thing I remember from the interview is how he stumbled when asked about abortion.  You could tell he didn’t have polling data to tell him where he stood. 

Tennessee Republican Nominee US House of Representatives, First District: Mahmood (Michael) Sabri.  This stems from the Republican Primary in 2008.  I felt that many of the attacks on Congressman Davis from Dr. Roe were unfair and outright lies.  His talk of PAC money was a way to show how it is “evil,” when in fact, it is really easy to turn down PAC money when you are filthy rich.  If I am pro-life, I would be happy to accept money from pro-life PACs.  Following the primary, I e-mailed the Roe Campaign and asked about him filling out a Project Vote Smart Political Courage Test that gives issue positions.  I was sent an e-mail with his signature saying that he would.  As of today, their site still says he refused.  Maybe this is more of a protest vote even against a conservative, but I do find many of his votes to be un-Constitutional as well. 

Tennessee Republican Nominee TN Senate Dist. 7: Stacey Campfield

Tennessee Republican Nominee TN Senate Dist. 17: Susan Lynn

Tennessee Republican Nominee TN House Dist. 3: Timothy Hill

Tennessee Republican Nominee TN House Dist. 4: Jerome Cochran

GENERAL ELECTION:

Washington County TN Dist. 9 County Commission: David Shanks

Posted in Blog News, Local News, Local Politics, News, Political Activism, Politics, Tennessee News, Tennessee Politics | Tagged | 1 Comment

Maps!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“We Con the World”

Posted in Entertainment | Tagged | Leave a comment

Vote for Me Please!

Please take time to register and vote for me in a father-son look alike contest. Thanks!

http://greenevillesun.upickem.net/engine/Details.aspx?p=V&c=17604&s=4082155&i=1&r=132433

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New Rise of Anti-Semitism?

Posted in International News, National News, National Politics, News, Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The (Near) Perfect Game

Armando Galarraga pitched what should have been a perfect game for the Detroit Tigers. Umpire Jim Joyce botched the call. Now it is up to Commissioner Bud Selig to decide whether or not to change the call. It is not likely he will change the call, but it would be great if he did. It is similar to the story of Ernie Shore. Babe Ruth was the starting pitcher for the Red Sox one day in 1917. He walked the first batter on 4 straight balls. Ruth was then ejected for arguing. Ernie Shore came on in relief and retired the next 26 batters after the leadoff was thrown out trying to steal. Some record books give Ernie Shore credit for a perfect game though MLB does not recognize it. Maybe it is time to fix both calls.

Posted in National News, News, Sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Funny YouTube Video

Posted in Entertainment, National News, National Politics, News, Politics | Leave a comment

Obama’s Growing Problem

Federal law states that a federal official cannot promise a federal position for a political act. Chicago style politics just a catchy phrase? Ask Fmr. Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Apparently someone in the Obama White House (and there would be a high probability Obama would had to have known himself) offered Rep. Sestak a federal job to drop out of his US Senate race against Sen. Specter.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=158617

Furthermore, the Census is having its own problems as it truly “creates” jobs created. So, is that a told you so as the Census structure was changed to allow the White House to have more control of it?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/two_more_census_workers_blow_the_OqY80N3DBTvL17VmxKKR0O

Posted in Constitutional Issues, National News, National Politics, News, Politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Rand Paul Problem

I don’t tend to make myself an apologist for politicians or aspiring politicians. In some ways, I may be doing just that with this entry concerning Rand Paul and his comments on the Rachel Maddow Show.  Last week on her television show, Rachel Maddow twisted Kentucky’s Republican U.S. Senatorial candidate, Rand Paul’s, ideology in a way to make it seem as if he wanted to reverse the Civil Rights Movement. 

Sensationalism is what drives ratings.  MSNBC needs good ratings as it regularly falls behind FOX News in ratings.  Rand Paul and Ron Paul always seem to be willing to go onto any news program that will have them, and as far as any politician is concerned, they probably have some of the largest followings.  MSNBC is a left-leaning news organization, lest we kid ourselves.  They need to throw some red meat to the left to keep their ratings among their target audience, so they need to go after Republicans any time they can.  Rachel Maddow is also an avowed liberal, so it would seem fair to assume that would come out in her program.  It does.  Add all of this information together, and it is easy to see why she would want to go after Rand Paul.  I cannot fault her for doing this.  Paul should have seen that this would be what she would attempt to do.

Many consider Rand Paul to be a libertarian.  Whether or not he accepts this label, I do not know, but his small government conservatism would, at the very least, mirror some basic tenets of libertarianism.  Being a small government conservative myself, I can easily see many, many places that I agree with adherents of libertarianism.  His views on government that he portrayed are now creating a bit of a crisis in his march to the U.S. Senate.

Rachel Maddow questioned Rand Paul about whether or not he believed that restaurants or other businesses should be able to discriminate and not serve someone based on that person’s race.  Paul never directly said “yes” or “no,” (MSNBC transcripts falsely used the word “Yes” to begin his quote when, in fact, he never said “Yes.”) but Paul attempted to explain that he had a problem with a government telling a private business who they must do business with. 

On the surface, Paul’s statement could seem that he holds to some unsettling racial views, if you do not understand the belief that government should be extremely limited.  According to many libertarians and small government conservatives, the only role of government is to insure the rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness or protection of property.  These adherents believe that rights not specifically given to government are understood to not be the power of government.  By extension, there is no specific allowance for government to interfere in private property, thus  the government should not have interfered in private property as they seemingly did through the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Paul deviates somewhat from his small government views by stating that he would not favor the repeal of the act, and he has even stated he supports the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Most people do not have such a view of limited government.  Many Americans believe that government should fix society’s problems.  How many times have you heard someone discussing a problem and someone else saying, “There should be allow against that?”  The left is for economic regulation.  The right is for social regulation.  Some in the middle are for some of both.  These views are hypocritical in a sense.  Where should government intervene and where should it not? 

Paul’s view is that  government should not interfere in business.  He believes that the government should not interfere in private property.  He believes that government should be very limited.  States should have the right to decide things not specifically given to the federal government per the 10th Amendment.  This view is actually what the Founders theoretically believed since this is the view that was incorporated into our U.S. Constitution, though it is entirely arguable that the Founders did not practice this. 

Let’s view this question for how it should be viewed.  You want to start a business?  Start one.  You want a restaurant?  Start one.  Who owns it?  You do?  Okay.  Run with it.  You want to serve fat foods?  Go for it!  You want to allow guns in your business?  Go for it.  You want to allow smoking in your restaurant?  Go for it!  You want to only serve those of caucasian descent?  Go for it. 

You probably agree with some of the above questions, but disagree with other parts if you are the average American.  The question that really frames the whole argument is, who owns your business.  Do you own the business?  If so, it is your private property.  Should you be allowed to invite someone to your private property and be allowed to sell them foods high in fat content?  Should I be allowed to buy food high in fat content?  Unless you are a strong believer that the government knows more than you do, then the answer is yes I should be able to buy or sell foods high in fat content. 

Smoking and guns are legal.  It is my private property, so should I not be able to allow people to bring legal items to my business?  Should people be allowed to bring guns to my property if I allow them?  Should government be allowed to tell me no?  Should I be able to allow people to smoke on my property?  This is where many begin to waffle.  People start talking safety here.  It is my PRIVATE property.  A restaurant is PRIVATE property.  The public is allowed to come into my PRIVATE business.  I am not forcing them.  They can say “NO!”  Why should people not be allowed to come to my PRIVATE business and smoke if I say they can?  I don’t owe workers a job.  They can choose to quit if they don’t want to be around smoke.  If they don’t want to be around guns, they can quit.  Keep in mind, it is PRIVATE property.  Whatever you think about smoking, it is legal and can  be done on private property.  Same with guns.  They can be carried on private property.  Well, that used to be the case.  Governent now views PRIVATE business as quasi-public, simply because the public goes to these places.

What if I wanted to allow you to smoke in my PRIVATE home?  Should you be allowed?  What if I opened my home to many people to come in?  Should people be allowed to smoke in my home?  Why would my restaurant be any different?  See how there is a bit of hypocrisy there?

Now, what if I were racist?  What if I just absolutely hated an ethnic group?  Should I have to allow anyone of that ethnicity to come into my home?  Apply that to a PRIVATE business.  This is where Rand Paul’s ideology becomes reprehensible to so many.  He has a belief that a person has a right to his or her property that government cannot and should not be able to control.  This is a belief that he holds to be absolute, regardless of how disgusting someone’s beliefs may be.  In other words, if someone is racist, it does not matter that racism is absolutely disgusting, but they have a right to their property so that they would not be forced to serve a person of that race.

Paul did go on and say that he would not join any private club that would discriminate based on race.  He has stated that he would not support repealing the Civil Rights Act.  He has stated that he would not go to a restaurant that refused to serve people based on race.  He just happens to believe that rights are not able to be limited just because someone else does not like what you believe.

Paul’s ideas are actually the basis for our government.  Many people are quick to say that we live in a democracy.  A democracy does not need a written constitution.  As a matter of fact, the nation of Israel is a representative democracy.  It has no written constition.  A democracy has no need for a written constitution because a simple majority vote (the people’s will) decides the law.  Our government is a democratic republic.  A republic allows laws to be created, yet laws cannot be created that will infringe on anyone’s rights.  Christians cannot vote to take away the right of Muslims to worship how they see fit.  Caucasians cannot decide to take the lives of dark skinned persons.  Republics have set limits.  Democracies limits are whatever the people decide the limits are at any given time.  In a democracy, rights are pointless because a majority can overrule those at any time, similar to how a Tennessee governor’s veto is pointless because a simple majority can overrule it.

Paul’s words do not show him to be racist.  His words do not say that he will support discrimination.  He has gone far to show and state that this is not the case.  He simply believes in limits.  How often does a politician actually live by limits of his or her own power?  Plenty say it, but few live by them.  Paul is a different kind of politician.  Whether you like his politics or not, you should take comfort in the fact that he says what he believes and that he will stand up for your rights whether he thinks you use them wisely or not.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, National News, National Politics, News, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment